outline :
focus 1: concentration/attention
focus 2 : writing/reading
- Intro
- attention getter
- background info
- metadiscourse
- Carr
- carr’s overall claim
- the internet has serious negative effects on our cognitive behavior
- carr’s sub claim
- the internet is worsening our concentration
- quote from carr to support his subclaim
- explanation/analysis of claim
- carr’s second sub claim
- were reading less and less quality things than ever
- quote from second sub claim
- explanation/analysis of second sub claim
- transition to thompson
- Thompson
- thompsons overall claim
- the internet has improved our overall cognitive behavior
- thompsons first sub claim
- quote for first sub claim
- analysis/explanation of first sub claim and how connects with carr’s first sub claim
- thompsons second sub claim
- we may not be reading as much, but we are writing and participating which is more important
- quote for second sub claim
- explanation/analysis of sub claim 2 and how connects with car’s second sub claim
- transition to my argument( strengths and weaknesses of carr and thompson)
- my argument
- anecdote
- my main claim
- the internet can have negative and positive effects, it all depends on how its used
- my first sub claim
- the internet helps us to learn multitasking
- quote from rheingold to support my first sub claim
- how my first sub claim connects to carr and thompson’s first sub claims
- my second sub claim
- the internet has caused us to produce less original works, plagiarism and copyright
- quote from Hayles to support my second sub claim
- how my second cub claim connects to carr and thompsons second sub claim
- what they dont bring up and my opinion
- conclusion
- so what?
- what we can do to improve
- annotated bibliography
No comments:
Post a Comment